Posted by: Meg M. | January 14, 2013

The Many Faces of Dorian Gray

I wanted to take a look at some of the interpretations of Dorian Gray presented in different media, specifically book covers, comic book covers, and actors from movie interpretations. As someone meant to represent the epitome of beauty, youth, and ‘purity’ of the soul as seen in physical form, it is interesting to note the differences and similarities of these varied interpretations. From actors to illustrations, each of these portraits adds a unique element to the discussion of Gray’s aesthetically pleasing figure. These are obviously not the only interpretations- there are sure to be countless actors from varied plays and smaller budget films, etc. I also found a great site that lists a ton of more  comic books in which Dorian Gray makes appearances than are listed here. Here are some of the faces of Dorian Gray:

Image

Hurd Hatfield in the 1945 film adaptation The Picture of Dorian Gray (source).

Image

Helmut Berger in the 1970 film adaptation The Secret of Dorian Gray (source)

Image

Dell Laurel Print Edition 1973

Image

Charles Aidman in the 1973 movie adaptation The Picture of Dorian Gray (source).

Image

Dover Thrift Print Edition 1993

Image

Barnes and Noble Classics Print Edition 2003

Image

Josh Duhamel in the 2004 film adaptation The Picture of Dorian Gray (if you can believe it). I personally couldn’t so here’s the trailer.

Image

Marvel’s 2008 Comic Book cover of Part One of The Picture of Dorian Gray (source).

Image

Tantor Media Print Edition 2008

Image

Penguin Print Edition 2008

Image

World Library Print Edition 2009

Image

Ben Barnes in the 2009 film adaptation Dorian Gray (source).

Image

IDW Publishing’s 2012 Comic Book Cover (source).

In seeing all these interpretations together, we must ask ourselves, How would we characterize ideals of beauty from the late 19th century? Do these ideals define or present any social issues of the time? Can this ideal of beauty be seen as having evolved over time? Is our understanding of what we consider sublime during the late 19th century something we can ever fully understand or appreciate, being influenced by images and ideals of our own time? And all this, of course, with a grain of salt: what is the value, if any, in categorizing and cataloging ideals of beauty,(limiting and excluding as they are) if only to understand how these ideals negatively impact any and all those who fall outside these narrow margins (however narrowly one defines them)?

About these ads

Responses

  1. Love seeing all of these images together. Are any of the productions worth seeing? I seem to recall the answer to that was no…but I can always hope.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Categories

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 52 other followers

%d bloggers like this: